Kündigung, lieber eine mehr wie eine Zuwenig : )
Kündigung, lieber eine mehr wie eine Zuwenig : )
Die große Reinigung : )
"Endlich hat es geregnet. Dreck und Abfälle wurden von den Bürgersteigen gespült. Ich arbeite bis zur Erschöpfung. 6 Tage in der Woche. Von abends sechs bis morgens sechs. Oft hänge ich noch 2 Stunden dran. Manchmal arbeite ich auch an 7 Tagen. Das ist ein verdammter Schlauch. Aber es hält mich auf Trab. Pro Woche verdiene ich zwischen 300 und 350. Wenn ich die Uhr abstelle, schaff ich noch mehr. Wenn es dunkel wird, taucht das Gesindel auf: Huren, Betrüger, Amateurnutten, Sodomiten, Trinen, Schwuchteln, Drogensüchtiger, Fixer, kaputte Syphkranke. Ich hoffe, eines Tages wird ein großer Regen diesen ganzen Abschaum von der Straße spülen."
Laut dem betroffenen komplett unerwartet:
https://twitter.com/donlemon/status/1650533617636966400
Soldaritätskündigung?
Gut, dass Rachel gekündigt hat bevor Russland sie hätte rausschmeißen lassen können.
Tucker Carlson hat jetzt übrigens genug Zeit für eine Präsidentschaftswahlkampagne. Bereit fur eine neue Stallel Russia Gate?
Alles anzeigenLaut dem betroffenen komplett unerwartet:
https://twitter.com/donlemon/status/1650533617636966400
Soldaritätskündigung?
Vielleicht geht Tucker Carlson jetzt zu CNN?
Heil Karlson.
Heil Karlson.
Der ist das personifizierte Hufeisen.
Keine Ahnung, von wem du sprichst. Die Qualitätspresse stimmt sich auf die Personen ein, die mich interessieren sollen.
Gott segne sie. Ich wüsste gar nicht wohin mit mir, würde nicht für mich vorsortiert worüber oder über wen man spricht.
https://www.tiktok.com/@msnbc/video/7226433564907277611
ZitatWith regard to age, I can't even say I guess how old I am. I can't even say the number. It doesn't register with me.
Joah.
Ganz interessanter längerer Artikel zu einer Rede des Nationalen Sicherheitsberater Jake Sullivan, in welcher das liberale Establishment offenbar eine endgültige offizielle Abkehr der Biden-Administration vom Neoliberalismus sieht:
Last week, the Biden administration announced the death of global economic governance as we’ve known it.
Alles anzeigen[...] Thus, there is a significant chance that wide swathes of Biden’s vision would be rolled back or nipped in the bud upon a Republican presidential victory in 2024. And even before then, the administration cannot realize many of its international aims without House Republicans’ cooperation. The Biden administration reached an agreement with 136 other countries on a global minimum tax in 2021. But giving that agreement the force of law will require congressional approval. And many of the administration’s other progressive ambitions, including promoting infrastructure development in the Global South, will be difficult to realize without further congressional appropriations.
Strip Global Bidenism down to the provisions for which there is a genuine “Washington consensus,” and you’re left with proposals for reducing U.S. economic dependence on China and constraining that nation’s economic development. Whatever its merits, this adds up to a decidedly less liberatory revision of global governance. And it is one that also entails significant risks.
In his most aggressive attempt to redress neoliberalism’s geopolitical consequences, Biden has sought to choke off China’s access to the world’s most advanced semiconductors, or the inputs necessary to manufacture them itself, no matter where in the world either are produced. The ostensible aim of this policy is to prevent the Chinese military from growing more powerful on the back of technologies produced or designed by the U.S. and its allies. But the administration’s export controls are not limited to firms with proven ties to the Chinese military. Rather, all Chinese businesses are barred from accessing the most advanced chips. In effect, this means that it is official U.S. policy to prevent China from achieving its economic development goals. Without access to the world’s most advanced semiconductors, Chinese firms will struggle to compete at the cutting edge of e-commerce, robotics, medical imaging, pharmaceutical research, self-driving vehicles, and myriad other markets.
It is conceivable that these restrictions will improve the prospects for world peace by deterring China from launching an invasion of Taiwan or other military offensive — although it is difficult to see advanced microchips having much bearing on a war in the Taiwan Strait.
On the other hand, it seems plausible that making it impossible for China to achieve its economic goals under the existing global order might render the CCP more inclined to challenge it martially or otherwise.
In his speech, Sullivan emphasized that America’s restrictions on U.S.-China commerce are narrowly tailored and that bilateral trade between the two countries actually hit a record high last year. But given the GOP’s perennial commitment to attacking Democratic foreign policy as excessively friendly to America’s adversaries, there’s reason to fear that the next Republican president will feel compelled to broaden Biden’s export controls, further poisoning the U.S.-China relationship.
Neoliberalism’s loosening grip over American political and intellectual life has created an opening for a progressive reformation of global economic governance. Jake Sullivan’s speech last week confirmed that the Biden administration intends to seize that opportunity. But absent sustained Democratic control of the White House, the president will have a hard time entrenching a new economic paradigm. And so long as the Republican Party remains jingoistic, the new Washington consensus will be at risk of devolving into something more destructive than its predecessor.
Allerdings scheint der Autor sehr fixiert darauf zu sein, dass die amerikanische #Zeitenwende nur von den bösen Republikanern verhindert werden könnte, und er blendet aus, dass der im Artikel durchaus gelobte Inflation Reduction Act auch deshalb - gerade in Sachen Subventionen für den Klimaschutz und den Soziastaat - so drastisch reduziert wurde, weil die Demokraten trotz ihrer damaligen Mehrheit in beiden Häusern in ihren eigenen Reihen nicht ausreichend Stimmen dafür zustande gebracht haben, und dass Biden sich dabei von zwei demokratischen SenatorInnen hat vorführen führen lassen, von denen einer selbst ein stinkreicher Kohlebaron und fossil fuel Advokat ist.
Ebenfalls unter den Tisch fällt, dass da zum Teil Gesetzentwürfe gemacht werden, bei denen den Demokraten eigentlich von vorne herein klar ist, dass sie am Ende keine Mehrheiten finden - auch indem man sie z. B, mit anderen Gesetzen zusammen abstimmen lässt, gegen die es zu viel Widerstand aus beiden Lagern gibt, oder indem man sie so formuliert, dass der republikanisch dominierte Supreme Court sie sowieso nach der ersten Klage gleich wieder kassieren wird.
Drauf gekommen bin ich durch einen tweet des passionierten Neoliberalismus-Kritikers Quinn Slobodian, der nochmal darauf hinweist, dass Totgesagte länger leben, aber trotzdem vorsichtig optimistisch ist, dass das Ding jetzt vielleicht wirklich endgültig tot ist:
Müsste dann allerdings auch mal jemand dem deutschen Finanzwirtschaftsminister erklären.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/bri…sting-in-america-cabinet/
ZitatRemarks by President Biden in Meeting with His Investing in America Cabinet
[...]
And their budget that they promote, that it was attached to their debt ceiling increase, but they tied together now. I want to make that clea- — you all know this, I know, but for the listeners — they’ve tied it together. They say, “We’re not going to — we’re not going to increase the debt that every President has done for the last 6 million years here…” — never had done anything but that — “…unless you pass our budget as we’re proposing.”
Ob sie ihn einfach mit KI-Anwendungen ersetzen?
Das regelmäßig sich wiedereinstellende Zittern, um eine mögliche Zahlungseinstellung der USA, erinnert mich auch ein bisschen an diese Prigoschin-Saga.
https://www.reuters.com/market…aders-meeting-2023-05-11/
ZitatPresident Joe Biden has signalled the chance of cancelling his trip to next week's G7 summit if the debt standoff is not solved in time, warning that failure to quickly to raise the limit on the government's permitted borrowing from the current $31.4 trillion could throw the U.S. economy into recession.
In den USA sind die bislang geltenden Migrations-Beschränkungen heute früh ausgelaufen.
Die vom damaligen US-Präsidenten Trump während der Corona-Pandemie eingeführte Regelung sah vor, dass Migranten schnell und unbürokratisch zurückgewiesen werden konnten. US-Präsident Biden hat dies zurückgenommen. [...]
Nur zweieinhalb Jahre nach Amtsantritt, und schon einen menschenfeindlichen Trumpismus abgeschafft!
Endlich reihen sich auch die USA mit ihrer flüchtlingspolitik wieder in den Kreis der zivilisierten Nationen ein.
[...] Die neuen Asylregelungen sehen aber vor, dass Migranten keinen Anspruch auf Asyl haben, wenn sie ein anderes Land durchquert und dort keinen Antrag auf Schutz gestellt haben. Ein Anspruch auf Asyl soll außerdem entfallen, wenn sie keinen legalen Weg zur Einwanderung genutzt haben.[...]
Von Deutschland lernen heißt siegen lernen!
Apropos US-Amerikaner befreien. Die Regierung sucht weltweit nach austauschgeeigneten Russen, weil sie ihnen ausgegangen sind.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/0…administration/index.html
ZitatAlles anzeigenWashington CNN —
The Biden administration is scouring the globe for offers that could entice Russia to release two wrongfully detained Americans, Evan Gershkovich and Paul Whelan, according to three sources familiar with the matter.
The US does not currently have any high-level Russian spies in its custody, current and former US officials say, driving the need to turn to allies for help.
The Biden administration is casting a wide net, approaching allied countries who have Russian spies in custody to gauge whether they would be willing to make a trade as part of a larger prisoner swap package. But US officials have also been surveying allies without Russians in their custody, officials said, for ideas on what might entice Moscow to release US prisoners.
Und:
ZitatThe White House is also exploring narrow sanctions relief, senior administration officials said.
The power of Geiseldiplomatie.
Also nen mega Trollmove wäre, wenn die Russen Assange damit befreien würden.
https://www.democracynow.org/2023/5/12/title_42_ends
ZitatAs Title 42 Ends, Asylum Seekers Face Inhumane Border Conditions, New Restrictions & Fast Deportation
The Trump-era Title 42 policy has come to an end, but the Biden administration has instituted what human rights advocates say amounts to a new asylum ban.[...]
Biden’s anti-asylum policies are “reconfiguring the concept of asylum to a point where it no longer offers the promise that it did post-World War II.”
ZitatDHS SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS: Let me be clear: The lifting of the Title 42 public health order does not mean our border is open. In fact, it is the contrary. Our use of our immigration enforcement authorities under Title 8 of the United States Code means tougher consequences for people who cross the border illegally. Unlike under Title 42, an individual who is removed under Title 8 is subject to at least a five-year bar on reentry into the United States and can face criminal prosecution if they attempt to cross again. …We are conducting dozens of removal flights per week, and we continue to increase our removal flight capability. We are increasing our efficiency and reducing processing times at the border.
ZitatA policy announced this week would force most asylum seekers to request refugee status in another country, like Mexico, before reaching the U.S., or face quick deportation. The ACLU and others are suing over the rule. Another directive requires asylum applicants to make their appointments on a Customs and Border Protection smartphone app that asylum seekers say is riddled with software bugs and raises serious concerns over privacy.
Meanwhile, migrant detentions at the U.S.-Mexico border are hitting record highs as Title 42 ends. Border Patrol authorities said Wednesday they detained a record 28,000 people.
Ach und hier noch was zum "geringeren Übel" Biden direkt:
ZitatAMY GOODMAN: You’re in California. In Texas, the Department of Public Safety and military were seen placing razor wire along the Rio Grande River in Brownsville to reinforce the border. Can you talk about the walls that President Biden said he wouldn’t be building, but what’s happening there?
ZitatPEDRO RIOS: What we are seeing is that there are several locations where President Biden is moving forward with building border walls. And these border walls resemble Trump’s border walls in terms of the features, such as the height, the type of material that is used. But sometimes they’re being branded under another name. In Texas, they are being called “levee walls,” but they mirror the same exact type of prototypes that President Trump at the time was proclaiming as completely unclimbable.
In San Diego, for instance, in the Friendship Park area, he is proceeding with building two 30-foot border walls that will completely decimate the experience that families have had when they arrive at Friendship Park and are able to meet their loved ones, albeit divided by the primary border wall, but at least have that experience. The visual landscape will be transformed by National Guard in — that is there, will be completely destroyed.
And it’s something that we are asking President Biden to stop building Donald Trump’s border walls. But we don’t see any type of leeway in that direction. And we’re hoping that civil society continues to lift their voices against these 30-foot border walls that are completely destructive.
AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain the harsher criminal consequences for those who cross, which means profit for the private detention centers, the jails along the border?
ZitatPEDRO RIOS: That’s correct, Amy. And so, what we are seeing is that President Biden is placing resources to further militarize the border by sending 1,500 troops to the border. We don’t know what their function will be just yet, except that they’re saying they will be having administrative tasks. But they do then add to the National Guard troops that certain states like Texas already have at the border. And this addition of additional military troops just paints a picture that migrants will not be welcomed with dignity, but, in fact, they will be welcomed with extreme force, that they will be turned away.
Du hast noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registriere dich kostenlos und nimm an unserer Community teil!